We represent patients who are injured and suffer harm and losses caused by the negligence and malpractice of doctors and hospitals. These injuries are usually preventable and occur because a doctor or hospital violates basic rules of patient safety in making their choices. Most of these injuries have a significant impact on the quality of a patient’s life and the lives of their families. Many victims of medical and hospital negligence are not able to return to a healthy and productive lifestyle and suffer great financial losses. Our goal is to promote patient safety and thereby reduce and hopefully eliminate certain recurring medical errors. We also believe that patients who are harmed deserve fair and just compensation to balance the severity and duration of their harm and losses.
Many surgical injuries occur because the surgeon chooses not to properly identify the anatomy and protect vital organs and structures such as nerves, blood vessels, and vital organs.
- During surgery to repair an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta on a 64-year-old patient, the surgeon chose not to properly identify and protect the renal vein and ureter causing a laceration of the blood vessel and clipping off of the ureter resulting in massive bleeding and kidney failure and permanent injuries and harms and losses to the patient who requires a tube to drain urine from her kidney.
- During hip replacement surgery on a 65-year-old patient, the surgeon chose not to properly identify and protect the sciatic nerve and did not properly correct the leg length resulting in permanent neurologic injuries and disability in function and use of the leg.
Errors in Diagnosis
- A doctor should choose to use the differential diagnosis method to diagnose and treat a patient’s problem. This method requires that a doctor choose to make a list either mentally or by documentation of all potential serious treatable illnesses that may be a cause of the patient’s problem. The doctor should then choose to obtain those tests and medical workup necessary to rule out each potential serious treatable illness. A doctor should choose never to eliminate a serious treatable illness from the list unless it has been ruled out. Should a doctor choose not to follow this method and this results in jury to the patient the jury may hold the doctor responsible for medical malpractice.
- A 45-year-old male presents to the ER complaining of recent chest pain. The patient recently had a spicy meal. The ER physician does a brief examination and ECG which looks to be normal administers some medication for a diagnosis of dyspepsia and discharges the patient within 2 hours. 24 hours later the patient suffers a fatal heart attack. The ER physician’s choice to send the patient home without ruling out a heart attack is evidence of medical malpractice.
- A 55-year-old woman presents to her Gynecologist for an annual checkup. The patient is in menopause and has glandular fibrocystic breasts. The doctor examines her breasts and feels a small lump in one breast. He thinks it’s most likely a benign cyst and tells her to wait for her next scheduled mammogram in 6 months. Unfortunately, the next mammogram and sonogram showed a suspicious nodule that was ultimately diagnosed as cancer, and the patient was found to have 3 positive lymph nodes. Unfortunately, the 6-month delay has resulted in the spread of breast cancer. The gynecologist’s choice not to timely obtain a workup to rule out breast cancer is a basis for medical malpractice.
- A 65-year-old male with a history of migraine headaches goes to his primary care doctor complaining of the worst headache ever. The doctor does a brief examination and says it’s just a bad migraine and prescribes Fiorinal for pain. 6 hours later the patient has altered speech and numbness on the left side of his body. He goes to the Hospital and is diagnosed with a major clotting stroke. Unfortunately, it is too late to give TPA to try and break up the clot and minimize the damage. The patient suffers permanent brain injury from the stroke. The primary care doctor’s choice not to send the patient to the ER to rule out stroke deprived the patient of a substantial chance for a better outcome and is a basis for jury finding of medical malpractice.
For 35 years we have achieved successful outcomes in medical malpractice cases, including:
- $2.5 million awarded for negligent administration of medicine
- $2.1 million awarded for negligent cataract surgery
- $1.95 million for negligent delay in surgical treatment
- $1 million in trip and fall case
- $2.1 million in motor vehicle and construction case
- $1.3 million awarded for negligent hip replacement surgery
- $2.9 million settlement for birth injury
- $900,000 settlement for Emergency Room physician negligence for failure to diagnose a heart attack
- $1.45 million settlement for failure to diagnose spinal abscess
- $750,000 award for failure to timely diagnose and treat infection resulting in septic arthritis
- $745,000 settlement for failure to diagnose breast cancer
- $650,000 settlement for failure to diagnose vascular occlusion in leg
- $550,000 settlement for wrongful death of 70-year-old
- $225,000 award for dental malpractice causing nerve damage
- $800,000 settlement for negligent perforation of the colon and failure to diagnose and treat injury
- $1.44 million award for failure to perform a cesarean section resulting in a hysterectomy
- $1.8 million award for premises liability
- $750,000 award against manufacturer for defective child hearing aid
- $990,000 settlement for failure to properly diagnose and treat stroke
- $835,000 settlement for failure to treat stroke
- $1.175 million settlement: Colonoscopy perforation and failure to timely diagnose and treat causes infection and wrongful death
- $915,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose heart attack causes heart damage
- $825,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose lung cancer
- $750,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose testicular cancer
- $800,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose and treat eye infection
- $765,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose and treat osteomyelitis in the spine
- $550,000 settlement: Failure to diagnose vascular complication causes wrongful death
- $700,000 settlement: Motor vehicle accident causes multiple trauma and back injuries
- $390,000 settlement: Negligent ERCP GI procedure causes pancreatitis
- $325,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose and treat perforation during cardiac stent placement causes open chest surgery and complications
- $550,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose and treat esophageal cancer
- $290,000 settlement: Accident on construction site causes knee injuries
- $250,000 settlement: Spinal accessory nerve injury caused by lymph node biopsy
- $450,000 settlement: Failure to timely diagnose and treat cancerous leg tumor
- $275,000 settlement: Failure to give proper treatment options for bladder cancer patient
- $250,000 settlement: Negligent surgery for removal of ovarian cyst
- $250,000 settlement: Motor vehicle accident causing multiple trauma and blood clots
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. We are happy to discuss your potential case and offer a free initial consultation. Please contact us today.